About the Judging

Judging Criteria

Former NRIB instructor Dr. Akira Totsuka (left) and Yukio Hamada from the Japan National Sake and Shochu Makers Association (right) judging entries at the 2017 U.S. National Sake Appraisal.
First tasting judging form (top) and second tasting judging form (bottom)

Fairness,
Transparency,
Authenticity

Entries to the U.S. National Sake Appraisal are evaluated in a blind tasting over two days with eleven participating judges, eight from Japan and three from the U. S. There are two sessions: the isshin, or first tasting, in which all entries are tasted, and the nishin, or second tasting of entries in the top 50th percentile of the isshin tasting. Gold and silver awards are determined by ranking in the nisshin session.

Entries are judged based on four criteria: aroma, taste, balance and overall impression. Aroma figures strongly in the judging of ginjo and daiginjo labels but is less of a factor with junmai entries. When evaluating the taste, judges also take into account body and texture. With balance, entries are viewed favorably when aroma is perfectly integrated with flavor and the sake possesses an overall harmony.

Taking into account a sake’s aroma, taste and balance, judges then mark the overall impression as (1) outstanding, (2) good, (3) average, (4) slightly flawed or (5) distinctly flawed. Results are tabulated using an Excel spreadsheet, with approximately  50% of the entries going back for the second tasting on the following day.

• The tasting is conducted entirely blind. At no time prior or during the Appraisal do the judges come into sight contact with the bottle, cap or label.

• Each entry is measured for glucose volume prior to the Appraisal. Entries are tasted in order of ascending glucose content. This facilitates a fairer tasting as low-glucose entries are not overpowered by a high-glucose entry tasted previously.

• Judges sample the sake from the same official tasting cup. This ensures a more accurate tasting than when each judge has a personal tasting glass which may contain residue from the previous sample.

• Each judge samples every entry and his or her score is individually entered in an Excel spreadsheet. Communication between judges during the Appraisal is not allowed, eliminating any possibility of outside influence.

page top